The British Monarchy is a dignified part of the Constitution. Why Essay

The British Monarchy is a dignified part of the Constitution. Why - Essay ExampleIn the plight of this, some(prenominal) scandals have been unearthed eliciting interest among the media and thus an increased call for Republicans making the future day of monarchy in question (Blain & ODonnell, 2003). In order to get an insight into the present and the future view of the British monarch, it is important to involve the composition of the entire British government that is the monarch, the House of Lords and the House of Commons in the proveion. Finally, the paper will discuss the British monarchy under the historical-constitutional context, political context and the cultural aspects with a view of establishing its constitutional validity in the UK. During the 17th century, British monarchs were empowered to make and commune laws governing land (Cannon, & Griffiths, 2000). The monarch was therefore an executive one. It is however worth noting that from the beginning of the 18th century , due to their impartiality, the monarch served as a constitutional monarch. Rules and conventions were drafted that would stay put them from making impartial judgements. In addition to this, the monarchs constitution power was limited during the reign of Queen Victoria. The main role of the monarch was in the first place that of advisory to the ministers (Cannon, & Griffiths, 2000). ... As the school principal of state of the commonwealth nations, the monarch has powers to confer titles, braveries and honours to persons who qualify. It is important to note that the monarch plays a key role in constituent organizations such as the Armed Forces and the Church of England. In the armed forces, the monarch acts as the commander and as such, soldiers during their asserting in to work swear allegiance to the crown but not to the state (Cannon & Griffiths, 2000). In the Church of England, the monarch plays the role of a governor. In addition to the constitutional roles of the monarch, there ar non-constitutional roles that the monarch plays. The queen for instance acts as a symbol of national unity where she is expected to preside over important state ceremonies as intimately as representing Britain in international arenas (Cannon & Griffiths, 2000). Much of the queens work lies on that of representing the state within and outside the UK. This alone raises the profile of the nation rhytidoplasty the interest of both foreign and local tourists. A vital role of the monarch that is imperceptible and unconstitutional is acting as a symbolic head of the British Nation. This role represents the intangible part of the British constitution. It is therefore exciting and preserves the admiration of a large population worldwide. The monarchy can be expound as a dignified part of the British constitution (Loughlin, 2007). The role of the monarch as enshrined in the British constitution can be examined by looking at various theories of the British state. First, the monarc h presents a modern pluralist interaction in governance. The ancient angle through which the monarch was first viewed has turn up